Purpose of Life, Modern Changes, and Human Isolation Essay

An especially confusing irony arising from Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot is that one of history’s more well-received and lauded plays is at the same time accorded so many diverse interpretations that understanding frequently seems elusive. The academic and critical literature clearly illustrates how the play has been debated. Exact thematic elements and even the playwright’s precise motivations have proven difficult to derive from the narrative’s textual structure. These interpretive nuances and proffered variations have been rendered even more suspect because Samuel Beckett offered evasive replies whenever he was queried about the intended function of certain characters or his personal intentions regarding any particular passage. These realities are not offered to argue that particular thematic features are incapable of determination, as familiar types of themes and thematic elements can be fairly well-established to a certain extant, but simply to point out and to acknowledge as a theoretical point of departure that Waiting for Godot is a broadly conceived type of narrative that touches upon many themes rather than being narrowly constrained to a particular theme. An examination of certain secondary scholarly analyses unequivocally illustrates the breadth of academic interpretations arguing that Beckett’s play addresses themes such as the meaning of God, the quest for individual salvation, the resistance of the French people against Germany’s occupation during World War Two, how human beings ought to live their lives in changing times, the fleeting nature of time, and the new circumstances that human beings had to adapt to in a post-World War Two era emerging from the Industrial Revolution. To be sure, with so many different interpretations supported by references to certain passages of the play’s text and relevant historical factors, it might seem highly unlikely to persuasively support a dominant or fundamental theme. A critical and comprehensive review of the textual evidence, on the other hand, does eventually suggest that there does exist a primary theme. This dominant theme in Waiting for Godot is that human beings can never truly understand the world in which they exist or how individuals are to be best integrated into a world with contradictory messages and imperfect information. Such a thesis can function to harmonize the different interpretations offered by secondary sources by showing how the main characters’ dialogue in different circumstances consistently illustrates and reinforces the human search for a definite purpose and a rational meaning in an external environment that persistently appears hopelessly incomprehensible. A Unifying Theme: Transcending Particular Interpretations To begin, addressing secondary theories before turning to the play’s actual text, it is necessary to demonstrate how academic and critical commentary has created more confusion than understanding by concentrating too narrowly from a thematic point of view. This type of analytical framework is necessary because virtually all of these at times conflicting and contradictory interpretations are capable of harmonization to a large extant if the play’s primary theme is posited as the individual human being’s desire to better understand and comprehend the function of the human animal in an incomprehensible external environment. It is superficially agreed, for example, that Beckett frequently utilizes universal themes in the narrative; in this respect, one secondary source argues that, â€Å"Waiting for Godot, in many ways, simply extends those uncertainties: Why are we here? Are we alone in an uncaring universe, or not? What are we to do while we are here? How can we know? And, ultimately, what does it matter? †(Hutchings x). This focus on universal concerns in the key to understanding the play and identifying the fundamental theme; indeed, these universal types of characterizations function in the larger picture to transcend more limited and narrow types of interpretations.

Free Speech Essay essays

Free Speech Essay essays Tom Metzger the president of White Aryan Resistance (WAR) and his son John Metzger have taught hate against blacks and other races as well such as Jews. Dave Mazzella was the Vice President of War and he also have taught hate to people generally white. Of what Dave, Tom and John said about hate Ken Death Mieske and few other people that was with him have killed a black man. His name was Malugeta Seraw a young Ethiopian immigrant was beaten by a baseball bat to death. Mr. Seraws family have refused to see what happened to Malugeta Seraw and they have sued the Metzgers or WAR that if they were responsible for sayings that they said. So therefore, is the Metzgers protected against the 1st Amendment, freedom of speech. Tom Metzger should be found liable in the death of Mr. Seraw. Tom and his son John did spread hatred towards other races especially blacks. He is a racist man as he laughed about everything in the trial. I know that hate is always inside of people like Mazzella and Death but their minds were taken by the Metzgers. Thanks to them they motivated them to hate and motivated Death to kill Mr. Seraw. Of course there is no connection to the killing with the Metzgers and Death. They both laughed about a comic illustration about blacks, which says they will loot your house and rape your wife. They have really spread a lot of hate throughout radios, articles and tapes. Of what they published about blacks in an article they really put hate words about them. If I was to read that article of course it would be tempting to do and hate against a black person. But really Im not that kind of person who would hate against anybody. Of course there are some people that I hate but thats because of who they are, they are just like the Metzger. Always hate on their mind which I do not find funny and interesting. Tom has said dont get mad, just get even af...

Netherlands decriminalised euthanasia-law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Netherlands decriminalised euthanasia-law - Essay Example The Royal Dutch Medical Association KNMG, together with the Dutch courts, have the responsibility of establishing and maintaining guidelines which are used by physicians in the selection of patients who qualify for either euthanasia, or assisted suicide. If the attending doctor follows all the guidelines given by the KNMG before assisting a patient, he is then not liable for prosecution. Over time, some of these guidelines are being ignored and some of the doctors have resorted to administering the operation without following all the legal guidelines (Dykxhoorn). The Dutch Courts have ruled that euthanasia is allowed to be performed by doctors in cases where, the doctor faces an irresolvable conflict between his responsibility to his ailing patient whose incurable condition necessitates euthanasia, and the Dutch laws which helped make euthanasia illegal. If a patient persistently and freely makes a request for assisted suicide as a result of his condition, the Dutch doctors are obligated to consider the request (Dykxhoorn). The first Dutch government study on euthanasia, The Remmelink Report of September 10, 1991 clearly shows that doctors are increasingly taking over making the making of the decision on if a terminally ill patient is to live or die. In cases where the patient wishes to be aided in suicide or needs euthanasia, the decision on whether a patient should continue to live or is to die is decided by a team of physicians and experts or exclusively by the attending doctor (Patients Rights Council). According to Derek Humphry, Switzerland is the only country, which does not, bar foreigners from obtaining euthanasia and assisted suicide services but laws are carefully regulated to ensure that the reasons for obtaining the assistance are valid as the Swiss laws require. (Humphry) Terminally ill patients should be permitted to decide on whether or not they want to die. However, laws and regulations should be enacted and be strictly regulated to ensure that

Research Methods Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Research Methods - Essay Example The main purpose of these industries is to develop products that could be used in everyday life and produce more and more employment opportunities. The research involves finding potential problems in the present products used and resolving them by upgrading them or using new products. The researchers found the flexibility of a product enables it to be used by more clients. Another important factor probably the most important one is the cost. If the final product is expensive there will be only few takers for it. Therefore research has been done to use cost effective applications. Another important feature developed by the researchers was reverse engineering. In reverse engineering the work is done from final stage to the initial stage. The main purpose of reverse engineering is to extract the code from the final product, working on the final product to the scratch. By using reverse engineering technique one can extract their competitors application and introduce own application in the market accordingly. Qualitative research methods are more often used as it involves observation of data that helps in finding solutions to the problems. Qualitative research has been categorised into three categories named as positivist, interpretive and critical. Positivist research methods